14 Dec I say that a massive Shag market does perhaps not allow it to be such as for example your state getting handled
Author's reaction: Big bang designs was obtained from GR because of the presupposing that the modeled universe remains homogeneously full of a liquid of amount and you may rays. New rejected paradox is missing while the from inside the Big-bang designs this new every-where is bound in order to a limited volume.
Reviewer's comment: The author is wrong in writing: “The homogeneity assumption is drastically incompatible with a Big Bang in flat space, in which radiation from past events, such as from last scattering, cannot fail to separate ever more from the material content of the universe.” The author assumes that the material content of the universe is of limited extent, but the “Big Bang” model does not assume such a thing. Figure 1 shows a possible “Big Bang” model but not the only possible “Big Bang” model.
However, for the popular traditions, the latest homogeneity of one's CMB are handled maybe not by
Author's response: My statement holds for what I (and most others) mean with the “Big Bang”, in which everything can be traced back to a compact primeval fireball. The Reviewer appears, instead, to prescribe an Expanding View model, in which the spatial extension of the universe was never limited while more of it came gradually into view.